Popular Articles
GE and Whirlpool manufacture some of the best-rated, most reliable appliances, although the brands h ...»
As washers became more complex machines loaded with useful features, they got better at cleaning whi ...»
LG Settles Front-Loader Washer Mold Lawsuit
Washer owners to get $35 or a $105 rebate on a new LG   LG has agreed to a preliminary se ...»

Least and Most Reliable Washing Machines

As washers became more complex machines loaded with useful features, they got better at cleaning while using less water. But breakage rates are surprisingly high for some, ranging from an estimated 14 to 29 percent by the fifth year of ownership. Consumer Reports’ latest survey reveals which brands are more likely to break and which make the most reliable washing machines. 

We asked more than 69,000 subscribers about their experiences with washing machines bought new between 2008 and 2016 and accounting for use and service contract coverage. Unlike our breakage data, our repair cost data does not control for the age of the machine, use, or service contract coverage. Here’s what we found. 

Agitator top-loaders
Speed Queen stands out as a reliable brand, while Fisher & Paykel is more prone to breaking than others. Estimated breakage rates for agitator washers range from 14 to 26 percent, and the median out-of-pocket repair cost is $112.

High-efficiency top-loaders
No brand stands out as being the most or least reliable HE top-loader, the kind without an agitator. Estimated breakage rates range from 19 to 24 percent, and the median repair cost is $140. 

LG and Samsung are among the more reliable brands, while Frigidaire is more prone to breaking, so much so that we can’t recommend Frigidaire front-loaders for now. Front-loader breakage rate estimates vary from 18 to 29 percent, and the median repair cost is $136.

Learn more about washers and dryers. Check our exclusive Ratings and recommendations, brand reliability information, and more for washing machines and clothes dryers.

Recommended Agitator Top-Loaders

To make our recommended list washers cannot have brand reliability issues. Additionally, high-efficiency (HE) top-loaders must earn a score of 71 or higher and agitator top-loaders have to score 51 or higher. Why the different standard?

“Agitator washers, as a group, do not perform as well in our tests for cleaning, water and energy efficiency, gentleness, capacity and noise, although they’re faster,” says Emilio Gonzalez, the engineer who oversees our tests.

So we set the bar lower for these machines, knowing that some consumers prefer agitator washing machines. None currently in our washing machine Ratings make the recommended list. The highest scored 47, the $450 Amana NTW4755EW.

Recommended HE Top-Loaders

Recommended Front-Loaders

They can’t have brand reliability issues and must score 80 or higher to be recommended. We set the bar higher for front-loaders since they perform better overall as a group.

  0 reviews
Your Name:

Your Review: Note: HTML is not translated!

Rating: Bad           Good

Enter the code in the box below:

Last Articles
The Tradition Of Sympathy Flowers At Funerals In Phoenix AZ
The practice of sending or bringing sympathy flowers to funerals is deeply embedded in Ame ...»
The Elegance of a Woman's Neck: Beauty and Care in Los Angeles
Throughout history, poets and writers have celebrated the beauty of a woman’s neck, likening i ...»
The Luxurious Life of Georgy and His Lincoln Town Car Limousine in San Diego
Today’s spotlight shines on Georgy, the proud owner of a magnificent Lincoln Town Car limousin ...»
Recently Reviewed